Close This site uses cookies. If you continue to use the site you agree to this. For more details please see our cookies policy.


Type your text, and hit enter to search:

Churches speak out on executive pay

A new report says we should focus on the ratio between the highest and lowest paid in a company

One of the great disappointments arising from the financial crisis is that despite the enormous support given the financial sector by taxpayers, and despite the concern expressed by so many about executive pay, little has changed.  Large bonuses are still being paid.  Last year, Shell paid bonuses to its directors even though they missed the target that had been set.


Bishops and other church leaders often speak out against excessive pay schemes.  Yet there has been very little analysis from the church investing community on what principles should be applied when looking at pay packages.  The Church Investors Group has launched a report on executive pay which meets this need.  The Church Investors Group brings together church investing bodies with over £12bn under management.


The independent report is the only report of its kind in the City in that it contains a section on relevant theological perspectives.  It focuses on justice and the need to treat people fairly.  We should focus not just on the highest paid, but on the lowest paid too.  The authors propose a ratio of 75:1 between the highest pay level and the lowest 10% in a company.  This ratio has attracted some attention.  The authors are not arguing against high pay (linked to performance).  In effect, the authors are asking us, why should the highest paid in a company be paid more than 75x the lowest?  This is a difficult question to answer. 


The report is about more than the ratio of course.  It encourages shareholders to link pay to performance and to discourage companies from competing to award higher levels of pay to their executives.  It also advocates simple and transparent remuneration packages so that it is clear what is being awarded.


The report provides some theological ballast for the chuch when speaking out about executive pay.  However, it also presents a challenge to the way things are now.  Companies should be run differently.  Investors should be bolder.


18 March 2010, 17/03/2010

The scope for government economic policy has narrowed, but something has to change.
Government needs to say will reverse or postpone tax cuts if OBR says not sustainable. Bank of England should improve its communications.
Why the Bank had to restore order.
Labour has to challenge conventional wisdom to promote economic growth that benefits everyone - otherwise our public services will continue to deteriorate.
What matters most is our economy's productive potential. We don't usually get something for nothing.
A sketch of where we are following recent data. Some investment and ESG questions.
The Bank of England's outlook in its August Monetary Policy Report was one of doom and gloom. It should ensure it is not captured by dated orthodoxy but ultimately government should act on cost of living crisis.
Not an easy task given uncertainties, especially if energy and commodity prices do fall later in the year. Ultimately, radical economic reform required.